|
|
The Influence of Post-Spacing Density of DEMs Derived from LIDAR on Flood Modeling
by Pierre Gueudet, B.S and David R. Maidment, PhD
ABSTRACT
The primary objective of the research is to determine the optimal post-spacing for
LIDAR-derived digital elevation models (DEMs) that is required to achieve
different levels of accuracy in the prediction of flood risk using hydraulic models.
For the study, high spatial resolution LIDAR data were collected by the
University of Texas Airborne Laser Terrain Mapping System and decimated to
generate a variety of DEMs with different resolutions for test and evaluation. The
data were entered as input to FEMA-approved hydraulic models at varying
resolutions to determine the sensitivity of the models to the changes in the
densities of the LIDAR ground elevation points. Data were collected in
Brownsville, Texas, in the area of the North Main Drain. A flood model was
developed using HEC-RAS to delineate the 2-year, 5-year and 25-year
floodplains of this drain. For each of the floodplains, 70 simulations were run
using different densities of LIDAR-derived ground elevation points. These
varying datasets density were also used to delineate watersheds. The work flow
sequence needed to produce the flood maps was automated using the ESRI
ArcGIS 9 Model Builder. Concerning floodplain delineation, results reveal that
below a certain density (5 ground points per 100m2 which corresponds to a 4.34
meter post-spacing), the LIDAR data become problematical for use in the creation
of accurate flood hazard maps. At lower ground point densities, flow obstructions
appear on the 3D cross-sections derived from LIDAR, and the inundation
polygons expand to unrealistic proportions. With densities greater than 5 ground
points per 100m2, the influence of increasing LIDAR point density is weak, and
the accuracy of the floodplain resulting from a simulation depends upon the initial
conditions of the model run. Concerning watershed delineation, no trend was
observed as the density of LIDAR points decreases. This result could be
explained by the fact that the area of study is extremely flat.
The highlighted links that follow are connected to Adobe pdf files
of the corresponding material. To view them you must have the Adobe
Acrobat Reader 3.0.
Download the
Adobe Reader
View the Report...(5471
KB)
These materials may be used for study, research, and education,
but please credit the authors and the Center for Research in Water
Resources, The University of Texas at Austin. All commercial rights
reserved. Copyright 2002 Center for Research in Water Resources.
|
|