|
|
An Evaluation of the Factors Affecting the Quality of Highway
Runoff in the Austin, Texas Area
By Lynton B. Irish, JR., P.E. William G. Lesso, Ph.D. Michael E.
Barrett, M.S., Joseph F. Malina, JR., P.E., Randall J. Charbeneau,
P.E., George H. Ward, Ph.D.
ABSTRACT
The main goals of this portion of the research project were the
identification of the variables which affect the build-up and wash-off
of constituents from highways in the Austin, TX area and development
a water quality model which incorporated these variables. This project
marked the first scientific use of a rainfall simulator in conjunction
with active traffic. Twenty-one variables were identified for each
storm event and multiple regression analysis was used to determine
the relationship of each variable to the quality of the highway
runoff.
The majority of variations observed in highway storm water loading
in the Austin area may be explained by causal variables measured
during the rain storm event, the antecedent dry period, and the
previous rain storm event. The examination of the controlling variables
in each model adds insight into the applicability of the model and
the mitigation of constituent loading. Highway runoff constituents,
in general, fall into one of three categories: (1) those constituents,
such as suspended solids, that are influenced by conditions during
the dry period and may be mitigated by dry period activities such
as street sweeping and others; (2) those constituents that are most
influenced by conditions during the rainfall event and may only
be mitigated through the use of runoff controls; and (3) those constituents
that are influenced equally by both periods. The constituents that
are significantly affected by conditions during the preceding storm
event, generally are those constituents that are controlled by the
dry period variables.
The highlighted links that follow are connected to Adobe pdf files
of the corresponding material. To view them you must have the Adobe
Acrobat Reader 3.0.
Download the
Adobe Reader
View the Whole Report...(2.4Mb)
|
|