An Evaluation of Highway Runoff Filtration Systems
By Sean Tenney, M.S., Michael E. Barrett, M.S., Joseph F. Malina,
JR., P.E., Randall J. Charbeneau, P.E., George H. Ward Ph.D.
ABSTRACT
A number of permanent runoff controls were constructed along new
highways in the Edwards aquifer recharge zone and their performance
has been monitored since the highways opened. The control systems
consist of a hazardous material trap, a sedimentation basin, and
a vertical sand filter. The filter is constructed as part of the
wall of the basin and held in place with filter fabric and rock
gabions. Numerous problems have been documented with these systems,
mostly in conjunction with the performance of the vertical sand
filter.
Sedimentation was the most important pollutant removal mechanism
for the runoff control systems. Modifications of runoff control
systems which focus on extending the detention time of the basins
may be more effective in controlling suspended solids in runoff
than enhancing the filter performance. Scour and resuspension of
sediments was observed in the detention basins. Sediment and suspended
solids removal efficiencies can be increased and maintenance requirements
reduced by the installation of rock gabions, baffles or another
device which reduces resuspension of solids.
Laboratory, bench-scale filtration columns using various media
were investigated at the Center for Research in Water Resources.
The performance of filtration media and adsorptive media was evaluated.
Media selected for these experiments include a well-sorted medium
grain size sand, a fine aggregate, grade 5 gravel, compost, and
zeolites. The data indicate that the compost is a very effective
medium. It out performed the other media for the removal of TSS,
oil and grease, and metals. However, the compost decomposes and
subsequent breakthrough occurs. The medium sand performed well for
the removal of TSS and most of the metals. Zeolites, pea gravel
and grade 5 gravel were not effective filtration media.
The highlighted links that follow are connected to Adobe pdf files
of the corresponding material. To view them you must have the Adobe
Acrobat Reader 3.0.
Download the
Adobe Reader
View the Whole Report...(610Kb)
|