REGIONAL GROUNDWATER FLOWPATH IN TRANS-PECOS, WEST TEXAS
Master Candidate - Hydrogeology
Department of Geological Sciences
CE 394K – Fall 2000 Term Project
___________________________________________________________________________
___________________________________________________________________________
My
objective of this project was to have experience in applying GIS technology in
groundwater studies. This project was based on the PhD research of Mathew Uliana
from the Department of Geological Sciences of University of Texas at Austin. He
did three studies – Chemical, fracture trace, and isotope analyses – to
delineate regional flowpath in the Trans-Pecos region of West Texas. For this
project, I used his strontium isotope data to map conceptual regional flowpath.
The location of
Trans-Pecos region is shown below. It spreads out over five counties –
Culberson, Hudspeth, Jeff Davis, Pecos, and Reeves – in the West Texas. Blue
dots represent location of the 29 wells from which water samples were taken and
strontium values were measured.

Digital
Elevation Models (DEMs)
Digital Elevation
Models (1:250,000) were used to look at the general topography of the area. It
is primarily located in the Toyah Basin. To the northwest, south, and southeast
are several mountain ranges – Apache Mountains, Delaware Mountains, and Rustler
Hills in west-northwest, Davis and Carrizo Mountains in south-southwest, and Star
Mountains in southeast.
(1)
Strontium Distribution
The
procedure required to map the strontium 87Sr/86Sr
distribution was simple and straightforward. The data I was given were in (x,y)
coordinates and therefore converted them into decimal degrees.
Decimal
Degree = Degree +(minute/60)+(second/3600)
The
data table was first created in Excel and saved as a database file (*.dbf).
Then the table was added to the project window in ArcView (Table/Add) and it
was added as an event theme in a new view (View/Add Event Theme). Spatial
Analyst and 3D Analyst Extensions were added (File/Extension) first to create
the TIN (Surface/Create Theme from Features). The 87Sr/86Sr
field was selected for Height Source and Mass Points for Input.
The
TIN theme was then converted into a grid theme (Theme/Convert to Grid). Output
grid extent cell size was chosen as the same as the TIN theme. Cell size,
number of rows, and number of columns were automatically given. The
counties.shp shape file from the exercise 3 was used to display the background
and the extent. The grid interval can be changed in the legend editor by double
clicking on the theme legend. Here the 87Sr/86Sr interval
was 0.001.

Before contours were
created from the grid theme, analysis properties of the theme from which
contours will be created have to be specified. To do this, go to Analysis,
select Properties, and set the analysis extent and analysis cell size the same
as the grid theme. The values in the rest of the fields were automatically
given. Then go to Surface and choose Create Contours. Contour interval here is
0.001.

The
grid and the contours showed the ‘plume-like’ distribution of 87Sr/86Sr
values. From this shape of distribution, the conceptual regional groundwater flowpath
can be drawn as shown below. The black arrows shows the conceptual direction of
groundwater flow in that region.

(2)
Potentiometric Surface Map
The
procedure for creating a potentiometric surface map involue some data
manipulation. The water level data (wlevels.txt) and well data (weldta.txt)
files for the five counties were downloaded from the Texas Water Development Board
website. From these text files, the fields necessary for this project were
selected such as state well number, longitude and latitude, water elevation
from the land surface, etc. Then in Excel, the two data tables were joined
together with the state well number which is common to both tables by using the
paste function tool and choosing VLOOKUP function. Lookup_value is the field
that is common to both tables. Table array is the range of data in the table to
be looked up. Col_index_num is the index number of the column of the data field
to find. Range_lookup is set to ‘true’ if to find the closet match. In this
case, the exact match of the state well number is needed, so it was set
‘false’. By this way, latitude and longitude, land surface elevation, and
aquifer codes from the well data table were joined with water level below land
surface, and date of measurement from the water level data table. The elevation
of water was calculated by subtracting the water level from the surface from
the land surface elevation. Longitude and latitude were again converted into
decimal degrees.

Then the new dataset
was saved as a database file (*.dbf) and added to the ArcView the same way as
for the Strontium distribution mapping. The water level measured in the recent years
was desired, so using Query Building tool in ArcView only 1999 data were
selected. For this project, it was assumed that all wells are in the same
hydrostratigraphic unit/same aquifer. All selected data for 1999 were then
converted to a shape file (Theme/Convert to Shapefiles).

The wells in the
Hudspeth county that were measured in 1999 were so sparse that they were
excluded. Using the newly created shape file, the TIN was created and then
converted into grid the same way as in previous procedure. The grid interval
here is 200 feet.

Contours for the
potentiometric surface map were also created the same way as in the previous
procedure. The contour interval is 200 feet.

The approximate groundwater
flow direction was drawn below indicated by the black arrows. The flow lines
should be perpendicular to the contours. The flow direction is in the general
trend as drawn with the strontium distribution.

The main problem with
this project was the very limited data for strontium values. If more data were
present, the grid and the contours of strontium distribution would be smoother.
GIS is a very effective
way to present distribution of strontium or other constituents in the
groundwater and to create potentiometric surface map. However, adequate data
that are evenly spaced are needed to get a good representation. GIS can still
be used with limited data but the other alternatives may be better to use.
Mathew Uliana, Department of Geological Sciences,
University of Texas at Austin
Dr. David Maidment, Department of Civil Engineering,
University of Texas at Austin
*********************************